Interesting how Paula Riches threatens to leave the Lib Dems and then  

prostitutes herself by accepting the offer of the next Lord Mayors seat.

 

Look at her email below and how she is going to deny ‘freedom of speech’

when she becomes the Lord Mayor. It is not for her to determine the

authenticity of statements made by members of the public and then make

that her basis for banning the public from speaking at council meetings.

 

Basically what Cllr Riches is saying; if I don’t agree with the speaker, I will

stop that person from making their deputations or asking questions.

 

Cllr Riches appears to be pleading for protection from Mark Austin. The

reason for this, is because the Lib Dems just don’t want to hear the truth.

 

If Cllr Riches becomes Lord Mayor, she will hide the truth from you the

voting public, with the subterfuge of claiming Austin is a danger to her.  

 

Mark Austin has no criminal convictions and no convictions for violence

so there is no basis for her claims of physical fear of Mark Austin. 

 

Therefore the only basis of her claims of fear is the fear of the truth.

 

Mark Austin and PO12BG are exposing the corruption

of both councillors and officers of the PCC.   

  

 

Subject: RE: Please read this [Re: Shunning]
> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:55:13 +0100
>
> Hi Colleagues
>
> Sorry I did not make the Lib Dem meeting but I voluntarily put myself into      
> solitary confinement as my daughter’s partner has swine flu and I have had
> my daughter and 6 week old baby staying with me this week.
>
> On the matter of a certain person.  I have seen Michael Lawther on many
> occasions stating that we as councillors should have some kind of protection
> from this man.  Then we get two security officers.  That was not what I
> wanted and guess you all agree with me.
>
> I have also made it clear that should I become Lord Mayor next year  I will

> be taking a very strong approach to having unscrupulous individuals                     
> disrupting our Council Meetings.  If there is proof of his allegations

> that’s acceptable but without such proof he will not be allowed to speak or
> make accusations against councillors or council officers.
>
> I would be most grateful if one of you gets back to me on the results of
> today’s discussions.
>
>Many thanks   Paula